
The NRA just allocated 290 million rs. to create seven local offices under it – is that a “good thing” or…?

Ministries already have offices at district level – or “line agencies” (picture) – and there are local bodies – DDCs, VDCs and municipalities – too

Why is it necessary to create a new parallel structure of local authority? The new NRA sub-regional offices shown next to the old structures

Who will handle the reconstruction money at local level: the line agencies, local bodies and/or the NRA offices?
The answer is indeed unknown as of now. Perhaps there is no need to worry about it: it’s possible that the authority of the NRA and its sub-regional offices will be clearly separated in words and deeds from those of the ministries’ line agencies and the local bodies. But even then, why not strengthen and work with the existing local offices instead of creating a parallel structure? We raise this issue simply because it’s hard to ignore the possibility that it might erupt. It’s positive that the NRA finally got off the ground but only the next months will show how well it works in practice, also at local level.
Like this article? Just click below to share:
2 comments
Why not work with local government where there is an element of local accountability under the LGCDP’s system of annual performance assessments conducted by independent auditors? Well I think you touch on the reasons – control of resources, centralised power, competition with other ministries, and national political party interests. Nice piece.
Exactly. Years of work have been put into strengthening existing local authorities – including mechanisms of accountability and transparency, which would be extremely relevant to utilize and build on as large funds begin to flow out to the earthquake-affected districts. Great comment.